Galen Healthcare Solutions: Allscripts Consultants Enterprise EHR

Last night, my colleagues and I attended a New England HIMSS event in Wellesley, MA covering Mobile Health. After battling through brutal traffic commuting from Boston to Wellesley during rush hour, we arrived and were all equally impressed with the night’s speaker -  Robert Havasy, Business Analyst at the Center for Connected Health in Massachusetts. I particularly liked the presentation technology used for his pitch – Prezi - a web-based presentation application and storytelling tool that uses a single canvas instead of traditional slides.

Some key takeaways from the presentation:

• Will the FDA regulate smart phones or mobile devices and treat them as medical devices?
• Patients are unencumbered by the regulatory process
• Two focus areas for mobile health technology
  • Capturing Data – vitals, blood sugar, etc
  • Coaching – guiding patients to make better choices
• Sunscreen adherence using mobile technology
  • Electronic monitor used to accurately measure usage of sunscreen
  • Reminder texts sent to mobile phone
  • After six weeks adherence rates for the reminder group were almost double that of the control group who did not receive reminder texts: 56 versus 30 percent.
• Utilizing text messaging to influence patient behavior -Center for Connected Health – project in Lynn, MA.
  • Two areas of focus: Opiate addiction and Teenage pregnancy
  • Localization is important – mention people by places and name
  • Who the message was from (especially doctor) meant more to patients that if it were personally addressed to them
  • Barrier to participation – cost – patients were afraid they would have to pay for the additional text messages
  • Unleash the nurses – nurse evangelist sells benefits to non-physician staff
  • Offset workflow changes in offices – take administration off of practice
  • Sustainable reimbursement structure – engage carriers – CMS – insurers – alternative quality contracts
• Northeastern University, working in collaboration with industry players, announced an incubator program for mobile health technologies. Contact Dan Feinberg, Director, Graduate Health Informatics Program at Northeastern University, President at New England Chapter of HIMSS, for more information

Tags: ehealth initiative, Extensibility, Integration, Interoperability, Meaningful Use, mHealth

Last Friday, I attended Governor Deval Patrick’s HIT conference in Boston and present my own musings and takeaways from day 2 of the conference. Be sure to check out Dr. John Halamka’s reactions from last Thursday morning’s CEO summit at the Govenor’s HIT Conference.

Keynote from the Surgeon General – Vice Admiral Regina M. Benjamin

• She covered how Hurricane Katrina affected her community in Alabama and the fact that due to the natural disaster, they were reliant on pharmacy chains to provide a record of what medicine the patients were taking.
• She also touched on a story of how members of her clinic were drying out the patients records after Hurricane Katrina and after they had them completely dried; a fire burned the entire clinic down. This brings to light the need for disaster recovery and collocation in some circumstances. Galen Healthcare Solutions proudly offer a downtime solution in its VitalCenter product.
• After the fire, Bentley college students came down to assist and one of those classes contacted the president of e-ClinicalWorks and convinced him to donate the EHR – integrated with both labs & referrals
• She stressed that prevention is the foundation to the National health System and as such we should be incentivizing prevention.
• She also mentioned how the EHR played a major role in prevention of errors

Getting Clarity – Developing Effective Health IT Policies and Standards

• Need to integrate claims and clinical data to provide total model for exchange
• 15 cents of every dollar in healthcare goes to administrative overhead
• Two key issues for data exchange – identity and consent
• Public Health entities currently receive data, however not every public health entity has the infrastructure to receive data
• How do we pull quality measures out of unstructured text?
  • Analogy of querying for alcoholics, but free text match is returned about using alcohol to swab skin before applying needle.
• The tough part of concerning clinical quality measures is the balance of structured and unstructured data
• Healthcare delivery is complex in that there is heavy fragmentation – 80% are solo or two physician practices
• Dr. John Halamka mentioned that we are the stewards of our own data and architecturally that is the design of the system

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs – Health IT, Business Opportunities, and Job Creation

• Healthcare workers do not have not enough IT in their educational curriculum
• Howard Messing, the President of Meditech mentioned that in Massachusetts in particular the cost of living is a barrier – Meditech actually has commuters from Atlanta.
• Girish Kumar Navani, CEO of e-ClinicalWorks indicated that they currently employ greater than 1000.
  • He anticipates hiring 500 new workers over the next 2 years for programming and business analyst positions
  • He also mentioned the analogy of the electrical socket – broadband network need to be as irreplaceable in physician office as the electrical socket.
  • He believes there is a need for a  new type of worker, the knowledge worker, who understands workflow and is able to analyze and make better decisions about population health
• Richard Reese, Executive Charmain of the Board, Iron Mountain, anticipates helping hospitals clean up paper mess.
  • He mentioned non-compliance in healthcare IT to storage and backup standards
  • Lesson in compliance can be drawn from Wall Street years ago and that healthcare organizations must design for workflow, but compliance as well
• Brad Waugh, President & CEO at Navinet, indicated that the network his company providers connects payers and providers, saving $800 million per year.
  • They currently require Microsoft .NET certified engineers and have over 30 openings
  • He indicated that the educational system must produce the folks needed in healthcare IT and currently it is just not doing so domestically
• This discussion brought to light a deeper seeded issue in American society in that as a society we are not pushing computer technology anymore as it is no longer the glamorized industry.
• There is a major need for qualified issues and it is a supply versus demand issue with the roots in education and society.
• One member of the audience mentioned that the goal of healthcare reform is to eliminate costs and the irony is that in a sense we are creating jobs to eliminate jobs
• Another member of the audience commented on the arrival of programs for night healthcare professional courses, much like it was the trendy thing to get a night MBA in the 90s
• Finally the point was made that by the middle of the current decade, we will be facing baby boomers hitting Medicaid and the amount of care they need is incredible. With less dollars, we will need to re-engineer the system and what could come as a result is care rationing

Panel: Successful HIEs – How They Did It and How It Helps

Fallon Clinic HIE

• Emergency care was the highest reason for HIE usage
• Some quotes from physicians on the value the HIE provided
  • “Importing the CCD expedited documentation”
  • “Reduced need to ask patients questions”
  • “Expedited verification of medication and allergy list”
  • “Saved time”
  • They estimate phone calls were avoided for 75% of hospitalist and were extremely beneficial for new patient visits
  • They estimate they spent 3 years and $3 million learning and developing “trust” and $1M in building and implementing in the final 2 years
  • Lesson learned:
    • They pre-registered all of their patients in the community (bulk-load) and this helped with performance as they didn’t have to query the state
    • They felt the key to sustainability was to reduce operating expenses
    • Each organization in the HIE was responsible for server maintenance – ends up being $2000/year/organization which represents rounding error in most healthcare IT budgets
    • Key points – earn trust – utilize real-world workflows – value of low cost

Indiana Health Information Exchange

• Federated data model – 62 hospitals – 3 billion structured results – doubling time of 4 months
• They meet the providers where they are whether it be delivery of data to the EHR or physicians receiving data as PDF or view into a portal
• They view sustainability in the sense of funding via offering services
  • work with public health services for syndrome surveillance and track immunizations
  • Their business model for sustainability is such that scale is needed and again they emphasized avoiding grants for operational costs.

NEHEN

• Their sustainability model is such that their organization provides governance – decide what has value – much as a board of directors would
• Federated model works better than centralized – more accepted in the marketplace
• Lessons learn include integrating processes across the enterprise
• The case of the transfer of information to public health is needed to sustain HIEs as well as the capability to sell other products within the network.

Tags: Adoption, Business Continuity, HIE, HL7, Immunizations, Integration, Interfaces, Interoperability, Meaningful Use

Last Thursday, I attended Governor Deval Patrick’s HIT conference in Boston and present my own musings and takeaways from day 1 of the conference. Be sure to check out Dr. John Halamka’s reactions from last Thursday morning’s CEO summit at the Govenor’s HIT Conference and look for a recap of day 2 of the conference on the Galen blog this Wednesday.

Keynote Address: The State and National Vision for Health IT and HIE

Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology – U.S. Dept. of HHS,  presented his own anecdotal experiences with the EHR, namely a story of how he was going to prescribe a patient a drug containing sulfa, yet the clinical decision support software in the EHR flagged him for a drug-to-drug interaction. If CDS tools within the EHR not available, would the pharmacist have caught this? Could the patient potentially been adversely affected?

Dr. Blumenthal then elaborated on two key components to which he felt would impact behavior via policy: writing regulations and spending money.

Regulations

• There have been 2000 comments received on the Interim Final Rule, with the publication of the final regulation anticipated by the end of the spring
• No comments questioned the conceptual framework nor the direction of Meaningful Use.
• The framework of Meaningful Use consists of 5 domains – quality, efficiency, patients & family, coordination of care, protection and security
• In speaking of the Interim Final Rule, Dr. Blumenthal utilized the analogy of an escalator – allow providers ease of introduction and steps for clear path of usage while lowering barriers to entry.
• Information Exchange – infrastructure is poorly developed for information to follow the patient and thus policy needed to address this. Certification will be the key to interoperability and with tighter standards, HIX should be more interoperable.
• CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments): Currently, legacy regulations are being addressed such that the barriers to LDX (Laboratory Data Exchange) can be removed.
• Privacy & security: Providing authorities with the means of penalizing individuals and organizations for violations to ensure controls, access, protection

Spending money

• Regional Extension Centers (RECs) are currently modeled after US agriculture, which was intended to disperse new info to the family farm. The goal is to ensure that HIT is reaching the family physician and providing advice in terms of selection and implementation.
• Focused on <10 provider practices such that the full benefits of HIT can be reaped by the practice. Facilitation of re-design of work flows and mobilization of information for quality and efficiency improvements
• 50 states have been funded to promote RECs.
• Different localities will have different solutions for health information exchange (HIX)
• 70 community colleges were funded for workforce training and it is anticipated this will facilitate staffing of RECs

Next Year: Direction

• Implementation
• Finalize requirements for Meaningful Use
• Beacon Community Program – Fund 15 communities around the country directly through a grant program with the intent to offer a source of lessons and inspiration. There have been over 130 applicants to the program thus far.

F/U Questions/Concerns

• Physicians are worried that HIT happens to them, not with them and that users not intimately involved with the design

Panel – Consumer-Centric: The Role of the Patient in Health IT and HIE

• John Moore from Chilmark Research introduced term the term “citizen” as the term patient can often be paternal. He mentioned a John Halamka quote – “automating bad processes will not lead to improvement”.
• David Szabo, a partner, Edward Angell Palmer & Dodge brought up the point of how do we go about engaging citizens and brought up some serious concerns over privacy, especially in regards to patient portals. The topic of behavioral advertising in PHRs was brought up and it was mentioned that  FTC may provide governance to this regard.
• A question was posed about those surveyed and focused on in regards to Healthcare IT in that they are predominately affluent and white. John Moore responded with mobile health technologies being the enabler to reach all demographics and minorities.
• A comment was made concerning the power of secondary data to pre-populate EMRs. Barbra Rabson, Executive Director, Mass Health Quality Partners, provided a response and brought up a cautionary tale in the highly publicized case of e-patient Dave as published in the Boston Globe.
• To touch on concerns about patient security and privacy in regards to the Personal Healthcare Record (PHR), John Moore also brought up a really cool Massachusetts company called “Patients Like Me”  and highlighted the fact that through this vehicle,  “citizens” currently share their healthcare stories and experiences.

Regional Collaboration Meetings (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT)

Later in the afternoon a breakout session allowed public officials to meet with neighboring states to discuss current plans, areas of concern, regional interoperability and opportunities for collaboration.

• NESCO (New England States Consortium Systems Organization) represents a business model built around collaboration and their Deputy Director, Nancy Peterson, acted as the facilitator.
• The idea of health delivery system reform was immediately brought up in that the system incentivizes and currently pays for sickness instead of for health via preventative and behavioral care.
• The model of the state of ME was addressed. Currently they have an operational provider-only HIE available to facilitate treatment improvement and representative of six of the largest healthcare systems in the state. The HIE, established in 2004 and live as of the summer of 2009, covers 50% of the hospitals 46% of ambulatory care.
• Some of the questions and comments posed by the audience included the following
  • How do we bridge between standards?
  • The business case needs to be established as this will drive investment. We need to clarify a vision and clearly express the financial incentive model.
  • Challenges with the business case in that savings on one side put costs on another.
  • We need to attack some of the low-hanging fruit first by implementing a common consent framework.
  • Ownership of the data: Who owns the data? The patient?
  • HIEs need to be consumer-driven.
  • Are we focusing too much on the standards with meaningful use, whereas we should be focused on the transport and the “network”?
  • Where are the interconnections in healthcare delivery that have the highest yields in terms of clinical data?
  • We face the underlying competing entities in clinical standards versus claims standards. Integration of the two needs to be addressed.
  • We are up against perverse incentives as there are many other resistive forces towards HIE, namely disincentives, in the health system.

Tags: EHR Implementation, HIE, HL7, Integration, Interfaces, Interoperability, Meaningful Use, RHIO

Galen Healthcare Solutions will be hosting a series of free webcasts covering ConnectR interfaces.  The purpose of these webcasts is to provide insight into advanced troubleshooting methods as well as advanced design and configuration options within your ConnectR environment.  We will cover various aspects of interface design, development and maintenance as well as best practice techniques.

These will be structured in a similar format to university courses – the initial three classes will be at 100, 300 and 500 levels.  The list of the webcasts and their times may be found below.

100 Series – Configuration and Deployment of Imagelink: Overview of Imagelink configuration within the AE-EHR and implementation of corresponding result interface dependencies.

• Wednesday, May 19th, 2010 at 2:00pm EST

300 Series – Advanced Troubleshooting: Error analysis and resolution as well as custom techniques for error remediation

• Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010 at 2:00pm EST

500 Series – Advanced Design: Interface filtering techniques and interface-driven tasking

• Wednesday, July 21st, 2010 at 2:00pm EST

To attend, please contact Justin Campbell, justin.campbell@galenhealthcare.com.You must be an existing Allscripts Enterprise EHR client to attend.

We also offer training courses and reporting services for the Allscripts Enterprise EHR database, ETL database, Analytics and the ConnectR  database.  Please contact sales@galenhealthcare.com for more information regarding these courses and our reporting services.

Tags: Allscripts, Allscripts Enterprise EHR, ConnectR, Database, Galen Webcast Series, HL7, Integration, Interfaces, Interoperability, Meaningful Use, SQL Server

Interoperability of EHRs with all of the peripheral devices that make an EHR a one-stop shop that the clinicians cannot live without seems to still be a challenge.  Despite “standards” such as HL7 which define how the systems communicate there still is significant challenge in getting through the projects.  It is by no means “plug and play” and the difficulty is in getting the parties to even have their own version of the standard specification.  The flexibilities of the standards leave some room for interpretation and this is where difficulty sometimes arises.

The desire to freely communicate is not there yet.  When folks start to understand that the end game is quality healthcare and if a system is easy to integrate with the customers will be more happy and everyone wins.  Unfortunately now, it seems that everyone sees integration as a constant revenue generator.  The costs associated are not bogus but without proactive thought to how to make a system be repetitively interoperable there is a significant waste of resources crafting the same wheels over and over.   I have been involved with projects where copious amounts of hours are spent discussing the most basic details of an HL7 interface because the parties involved don’t know anything about the fields or the data.  I have also been involved in the antipodean scenario where both parties show their standard specifications, discuss the minor differences and they agree upon who is going to accommodate the differences and moments later they can send test transactions.

The tendency for integration points to become projects by themselves inherently lengthens the process.  With the lack of knowledge often exhibited on such projects they tend to collect teams of individuals who collectively should have the knowledge to make the integration work, but the points of ignorance of those individuals in other areas exponentially increase the topics of discussion that are in play to educate everyone involved.   This becomes very annoying to the individual that has their stuff together on the the other end of the integration.

The challenge to healthcare organizations is that the complexity of the EHR is not only a complex IT project but one that also demands a clinical understanding to help with all of the integration.  Clinical organizations are required to have resources that are more technical and the technical resources have to have clinical knowledge about what they are doing.  It is extremely difficult to complete a lab interface if you don’t have the knowledge of how to flip the flags and when to flip the flags.

The resources involved in integration need to step up and take the time to learn what they are doing rather than spending one hour a week trying to make something work.   Know your part and then some and don’t waste others time.  If you know what you are talking about and what you want the efficiency of the process is greatly increased.

I argue that a clinical organization that takes the time to acquire or train an individual that knows their business on integration will recover his/her salary multiple times in EHR efficiency, buy-in and ability.  I have seen organizations where they pay both vendors $30,000 to complete 20 integration points, why not pay one individual $60,000 for 10 years or $100,000 for 6 years.  I have seen this work.   Once you have the individual on staff the integrations become easier and easier and even a small interface that only aids a few clinicians is now justifiable.

There are other staffing changes that seem and are significantly different, but when you compare them to what you might spend paying to have the work done elsewhere, they make sense.

Tags: EHR, EHR Implementation, Interoperability